Enabling Conditions for Community Wealth Building

CWB

By Neil McInroy, Sarah McKinley, Nairuti Shastry and CWB Community of Practice

May 12, 2025

What are the Enabling Conditions?

Enabling conditions are identified from observed patterns of Community Wealth Building (CWB) in practice, including from the work of practitioners in The Democracy Collaborative’s CWB Community of Practice. They also reflect the learning from TDC’s engagement with CWB practitioners and partner organizations across the USA and abroad.

These conditions are identified from observed patterns of CWB in practice, including from the work of practitioners in The Democracy Collaborative’s CWB Community of Practice. They also reflect the learning from TDC’s engagement with CWB practitioners and partner organizations across the USA and abroad. 

Background

At The Democracy Collaborative, we believe that the multiple crises we face are driven by the extractive nature of our current economic system: characterized by concentrated ownership, community disinvestment, increasing precarity of labor, environmental degradation, and structural injustices.

We believe that Community Wealth Building has the potential to directly confront and address these trends and build an economic system where ownership is shared — broadly, democratically, and equitably.

This is very hard work. The problems are easy to see; they are all around us and we are dealing with their consequences every day. But the way forward is not as clear. Systems of power and wealth benefit from the existing order and either choose to ignore the problems or actively mount barriers in the way of solving them.

As such, system change is essential.

CWB’s theory of change is based on a steady, inexorable process of designing, building, and scaling solutions, leveraging both the tools at our disposal while simultaneously innovating new ones to tackle our economic system at the root.

State vs Civil Society

Drawing on our experience working alongside Community Wealth Builders in the United States and Scotland, we are witnessing three sociocultural conditions which influence the success in driving broad-scale economic transformation within and beyond the state. In this we can see how some core overarching dynamics greatly influence the governance, and thereby expansion, of CWB:

  • An enduring sense of injustice

  • Trust in the efficacy of the state

  • Presence of a robust civil society, that can assist, agitate, and morph into more active social movements

What is clear across all three conditions is that the patterns of change and scale of CWB are influenced by the power of the state and its relationship to its citizens.

The relative absence or mistrust of the state can fuel a grassroots activism that can help drive CWB.

A state that is aware of and responsive to the people’s will must embrace the grassroots energy of CWB, so that a powerful pace and depth of change is facilitated.

Enabling Conditions

What is evident is that there is no one-size-fits-all model of Community Wealth Building. Each approach will be different, based on local context, resources, and politics.

For example, some places take up CWB more readily while others do not. CWB action moves faster and goes deeper in some areas than in others. CWB will sometimes start slow and build toward greater momentum, while other times it starts with a bang and then peters out. These variations illustrate the different enabling conditions that impact the viability, uptake, growth, and sustainability of a CWB strategy locally.

It is therefore important to be aware of these conditions, take advantage of their presence, and work on developing them when they are absent - and/or seek to nurture and scale them when they are present.

But there are patterns across practice.

Below we outline our initial observations of these enabling conditions, separated into three broad groupings.

These conditions have differing levels of importance at different stages of Community Wealth Building evolution. Some are more important when getting started, while others are instrumental to sustaining the approach over time.

Ultimately, however, the presence of one or more of these enabling conditions is necessary to support CWB in a local landscape.

Moving Forward

Not every place will have all of these enabling conditions — nor do they need to in order to get started.

Some of these conditions are catalytic, while others are about staying power and the enduring quality of a longterm Community Wealth Building strategy. However, many of these conditions can be cultivated through broader movement networking, partnership and collaboration.

Some of these conditions are more important than others, depending on the place and its context. Various combinations of these factors can be at play in any given place at any given time; some will be stronger or more dominant than others at different times, so it is important to be able to use such openings as opportunities and go where a community’s strengths and energy are.

Determining the presence and sophistication of these various conditions in a given place is helpful in assessing a community’s readiness for CWB strategy.

Ultimately, a successful CWB approach must nestle within the personal, political, cultural and institutional context of a place, leveraging and augmenting — and ultimately transforming — what already exists.

Doing so will not only empower more immediate action, but help sustain Community Wealth Building as central to economic change.


Want to learn more about Community Wealth Building?

Join one of our training sessions or contact us for more information

Previous
Previous

The Case for Community Wealth Building in South Korea

Next
Next

Return of the Robber Barons